Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Security Boulevard

The Home of the Security Bloggers Network

Community Chats Webinars Library

Home
Security Creators Network
Webinars
Events
- Upcoming Events
- On-Demand Events
Sponsored Content
Chat
Library
Related Sites
Media Kit
About
Sponsor

Analytics
AppSec
CISO
Cloud
DevOps
GRC
Identity
Incident Response
IoT / ICS
Threats / Breaches
More
Humor

Data Security Events Security Bloggers Network

Home » Cybersecurity » Data Security » CPDP 2021 – Moderator: Rosamunde Van Brakel ‘Involving Data Subjects In Democratic Oversight Of Police-Use Of Surveillance Technologies’

CPDP 2021 – Moderator: Rosamunde Van Brakel ‘Involving Data Subjects In Democratic Oversight Of Police-Use Of Surveillance Technologies’

by Marc Handelman on May 18, 2021

Speakers: Arne Hintz, Quirine Eijkman, Marion Oswald, Koen Gorissen

Techstrong Gang Youtube

AWS Hub

Our sincere thanks to CPDP 2021 – Computers, Privacy & Data Protection Conference for publishing their well-crafted videos on the organization’s YouTube channel. Enjoy!

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Infosecurity.US authored by Marc Handelman. Read the original post at: https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/E7E4DWNzOzo

May 18, 2021May 18, 2021 Marc Handelman Conferences, CPDP 2021, Cyber Security, data protection, education, Information Security, Infosec Education, Privacy Education

← Do You Think Your Healthcare Data Is Safe?
3 Reasons to Attend Data Company Conference 2021 →

Techstrong TV

Click full-screen to enable volume control

Watch latest episodes and shows

Tech Field Day Experience at Qlik Connect 2025

Upcoming Webinars

Software Supply Chain Security: Navigating NIST, CRA, and FDA Regulations

Podcast

Listen to all of our podcasts

Press Releases

GoPlus's Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

C2A Security’s EVSec Risk Management and Automation Platform Gains Traction in Automotive Industry as Companies Seek to Efficiently Meet Regulatory Requirements

C2A Security’s EVSec Risk Management and Automation Platform Gains Traction in Automotive Industry as Companies Seek to Efficiently Meet Regulatory Requirements

Zama Raises $73M in Series A Lead by Multicoin Capital and Protocol Labs to Commercialize Fully Homomorphic Encryption

Zama Raises $73M in Series A Lead by Multicoin Capital and Protocol Labs to Commercialize Fully Homomorphic Encryption

RSM US Deploys Stellar Cyber Open XDR Platform to Secure Clients

RSM US Deploys Stellar Cyber Open XDR Platform to Secure Clients

ThreatHunter.ai Halts Hundreds of Attacks in the past 48 hours: Combating Ransomware and Nation-State Cyber Threats Head-On

ThreatHunter.ai Halts Hundreds of Attacks in the past 48 hours: Combating Ransomware and Nation-State Cyber Threats Head-On

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Most Read on the Boulevard

EU Stakes Out Digital Sovereignty With Vulnerability Database

Tracking Accusations May Have Roblox Back in Court

Strategic Defense Innovation: Israel and South Korea’s Technological Partnership

Survey: Too Much Time Being Spent on Managing Cybersecurity Tools

The Coinbase Data Breach: A Breakdown of What Went Wrong

BSidesLV24 – GroundFloor – Adversaries Also Lift & Shift: Cloud Threats Through The Eyes Of An Adversary

OAuth 2.0 Overview

Are You Capable of Securing Your Digital Assets?

Fairfax County, Va., CISO Michael Dent on Leadership

Industry Spotlight

Cloud Security Cybersecurity Data Privacy Data Security Featured Identity & Access Industry Spotlight Network Security News Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Spotlight Threats & Breaches

Coinbase Says Breach May Cost $400 Million, Issues $20 Million Bounty

May 16, 2025 Jeffrey Burt | May 16 0

Analytics & Intelligence Cloud Security Cybersecurity Data Privacy Data Security DevOps Endpoint Featured Governance, Risk & Compliance Humor Identity & Access Incident Response Industry Spotlight Malware Mobile Security Most Read This Week Network Security News Popular Post Security Awareness Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Social Engineering Spotlight Threat Intelligence Threats & Breaches Vulnerabilities

Warning to US Retail: ‘Scattered Spider’ Targets YOU (with DragonForce Ransomware)

May 15, 2025 Richi Jennings | May 15 0

Application Security Cloud Security Cyberlaw Cybersecurity Data Privacy Data Security DevOps Endpoint Featured Governance, Risk & Compliance Humor Identity & Access Industry Spotlight IoT & ICS Security Mobile Security Most Read This Week Network Security News Popular Post Security Awareness Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Spotlight Threats & Breaches Vulnerabilities

As US CVE Database Fumbles, EU ‘Replacement’ Goes Live

May 14, 2025 Richi Jennings | May 14 0

Top Stories

Cybersecurity Featured News Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Spotlight

Survey: Too Much Time Being Spent on Managing Cybersecurity Tools

May 21, 2025 Michael Vizard | Yesterday 0

Cybersecurity Featured News Security Awareness Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Spotlight

Linux Foundation Shares Framework for Building Effective Cybersecurity Teams

May 16, 2025 Michael Vizard | May 16 0

Cyberlaw Cybersecurity Featured Governance, Risk & Compliance Network Security News Security Awareness Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Spotlight

DHS Cancels $2.4 Billion Leidos Contract, Cites Changes at CISA

May 15, 2025 Jeffrey Burt | May 15 0

Security Humor

Randall Munroe’s XKCD ‘Renormalization’

Randall Munroe’s XKCD ‘Renormalization’

Download Free eBook

The Dangers of Open Source Software and Best Practices for Securing Code

Join the Community

Add your blog to Security Creators Network
Write for Security Boulevard
Bloggers Meetup and Awards
Ask a Question
Email: info@securityboulevard.com

Useful Links

About
Media Kit
Sponsor Info
Copyright
TOS
DMCA Compliance Statement
Privacy Policy

Related Sites

Techstrong Group
Cloud Native Now
DevOps.com
Digital CxO
Techstrong Research
Techstrong TV
Techstrong.tv Podcast
DevOps Chat
DevOps Dozen
DevOps TV

Powered by Techstrong Group

Copyright © 2025 Techstrong Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Security in AI

Step 1 of 7

14%

How would you best describe your organization's current stage of securing the use of generative AI in your applications?(Required)

We don’t have or use generative AI in our applications

Nothing significant yet - We have or will have generative AI in our applications but haven’t yet researched or explored the possibility of securing it.

Starting - We have begun to work on securing generative AI in our applications.

Developing - We have started to implement some security measures for generative AI.

Average - We have some policies or tools in place.

Advanced - We have some enhanced security protocols specifically tailored for generative AI in our applications.

Very advanced - We have comprehensive, mature, and proactive security solutions for generative AI in our applications.

Have you implemented, or are you planning to implement, zero trust security for the AI your organization uses or develops?(Required)

Already implemented

Planning to implement

Considering or scoping to implement

Not considering zero trust for AI

Do not use zero trust at all

Don’t know

What are the three biggest challenges your organization faces when integrating generative AI into applications or workflows? (Select up to three)(Required)

Data security or privacy

Security of prompts or responses

Intellectual property protection

Compliance with standards and regulations

Lack of expertise or experience

Potential impacts on performance or scalability of the applications

Integration capabilities of current systems

Cost to implement

Potential impacts on performance or scalability of the AI

Access security

How does your organization secure proprietary information used in AI training, tuning, or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)? (Select all that apply)(Required)

Encryption at rest

Encryption in transit

Data access control, monitoring

Data anonymization

Data/information isolation

Data masking/tokenization

Data governance policies

Zero trust / continuous authentication and authorization

No specific measures in place

Which of the following kinds of tools are you currently using to secure your organization’s use of generative AI? (select all that apply)(Required)

Native cloud service tools (AWS Guardrails, e.g.)

Third-party tools

Custom in-house tools

No specific tools

How valuable do you think it would it be to have a solution that classifies and quantifies risks associated with generative AI tools?(Required)

Extremely valuable

Very valuable

Somewhat valuable

Not valuable

What are, or do you think would be, the most important reasons for implementing generative AI security measures? (Select up to three)(Required)

Regulatory compliance

Protecting intellectual property

Mitigating potential data breaches

Maintaining customer trust

Competitive advantage

Improved risk management

Increased operational efficiency

Don’t know

View results

Δ

Notifications