• Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
MUST READ

Operation CargoTalon targets Russia’s aerospace with EAGLET malware,

 | 

Unpatched flaw in EoL LG LNV5110R cameras lets hackers gain Admin access

 | 

Koske, a new AI-Generated Linux malware appears in the threat landscape

 | 

Mitel patches critical MiVoice MX-ONE Auth bypass flaw

 | 

Coyote malware is first-ever malware abusing Windows UI Automation

 | 

SonicWall fixed critical flaw in SMA 100 devices exploited in Overstep malware attacks

 | 

DSPM & AI Are Booming: $17.87B and $4.8T Markets by 2033

 | 

Stealth backdoor found in WordPress mu-Plugins folder

 | 

U.S. CISA adds CrushFTP, Google Chromium, and SysAid flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

U.S. CISA urges FCEB agencies to fix two Microsoft SharePoint flaws immediately and added them to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

Sophos fixed two critical Sophos Firewall vulnerabilities

 | 

French Authorities confirm XSS.is admin arrested in Ukraine

 | 

Microsoft linked attacks on SharePoint flaws to China-nexus actors

 | 

Cisco confirms active exploitation of ISE and ISE-PIC flaws

 | 

SharePoint under fire: new ToolShell attacks target enterprises

 | 

CrushFTP zero-day actively exploited at least since July 18

 | 

Hardcoded credentials found in HPE Aruba Instant On Wi-Fi devices

 | 

MuddyWater deploys new DCHSpy variants amid Iran-Israel conflict

 | 

U.S. CISA urges to immediately patch Microsoft SharePoint flaw adding it to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

 | 

Microsoft issues emergency patches for SharePoint zero-days exploited in "ToolShell" attacks

 | 
  • Home
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cyber warfare
  • APT
  • Data Breach
  • Deep Web
  • Digital ID
  • Hacking
  • Hacktivism
  • Intelligence
  • Internet of Things
  • Laws and regulations
  • Malware
  • Mobile
  • Reports
  • Security
  • Social Networks
  • Terrorism
  • ICS-SCADA
  • POLICIES
  • Contact me
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Digital ID
  • The importance of computer identity in network communications: how to protect it and prevent its theft

The importance of computer identity in network communications: how to protect it and prevent its theft

Pierluigi Paganini December 09, 2020

The importance of computer identity in network communications: how to protect it and prevent threat actors from spying or stealing on online communications

When you fill out a registration form to take advantage of a web service, a virtual personal profile is generated, creating your own IT identity characterized by specific attributes.

Even those who must manage and provide this service must have their own digital identity. In this way, an interaction between the virtual identities of the customer and the supplier is established.

The service management system, before granting the interlocutor access to the resources, will have to start an identification process to verify the correspondence of the specific identity attributes in compliance with the fundamental protection parameters for IT security: confidentiality and integrity of information, interlocutors authentication and authorization of access to relevant resources.

The confidentiality of information in internet communications

Internet communications use the protocol called TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol), which allows information to be transmitted from one computer to another through a series of intermediate computers and networks.

Without measures of prevention, a stranger to computer communications could interfere through “man in the middle” type interceptions.

In this regard, the HTTPS protocol has been implemented from the very beginning in an attempt to avert this threat, not completely eradicated, through public key cryptography techniques.

The most common algorithms are those patented by RSA Data Security: This algorithm, also called asymmetric key cryptography, provides a pair of keys (a public and private key) associated with an entity that authenticates the identity of the key itself.

Cryptography alone, while solving the problem of confidentiality violation, cannot solve the problem of integrity and false authentication.

The hash function

Hash encryption is used to ensure integrity and authentication. The hash functions are implemented according to the following features:

  • the value returned by the function is unique for each input data and represents a summary of the data itself;
  • each variation of the data results in a different hash value;
  • the returned hash value cannot be deducted from the function itself.

The digital signature is basically based on the use of a hash algorithm.

In a tipical network correspondence, the elements sent to the recipient are the original document in clear text and the hash value of the original document, encrypted with the private key of the signatory (digital signature). To verify the integrity of the information, the receiving software, decrypts the digital signature with the signatory’s public key, obtains the hash value of the signatory and generates with the same algorithm a new hash from the original document received. Two different hash values indicate that the information has been altered or the digital signature has been created with a private key that does not match the signer’s public key.

Mutual authentication of interlocutors

When perform authentication in a network communication where a client (e.g. a browser) dialogues with the various remote servers providing services, it is very important the mutual authentication between the user and the service provider. There are several ways to do this:

  • use of simple credentials. The classic method for authentication is based on the use of a pair of username and password credentials. In this case, the communication protocol will verify their correspondence with those present in its database and if so, it will authorize access;
  • use of public-key digital certificates. Another authentication method is the one with the digital certificate, used by the secure protocol HTTPS. In the recognition process the server will require authentication of the client according to a communication protocol based on an exchange of public and private keys that, if they attest to the identity of the client, ends with the access authorization to the requested resource;
  • use multi-factor authentication. An authentication with two or more factors is therefore opposed to a simple authentication based on a password only (one-factor authentication). The forms of multi-factor authentication use a combination of methodologies defined in this way:
    • one thing you know: a password;
    • something you have: a physical object (e.g. a smart card, token USB);
    • something you are: a biometric feature (e.g. a fingerprint, facial features).

Critical issues about different authentication modes

By comparing these authentication modes you can see that:

  • the classic approach using a pair of credentials is vulnerable especially because data could be accessed using techniques such as SQL injection, phishing and social engineering;
  • The certificate approach is vulnerable because the certificate may not be verified and reliable. Also, because data protection before and after encryption cannot be guaranteed, if clients and communication servers have already been compromised with malware, integrity and confidentiality may still be at risk;
  • the multi-factor authentication system, while strengthening the degree of security, with greater economic effort and increased complexity for the service provider only makes life more difficult for criminal hackers, but not impossible. They will only have to overcome multiple levels of protection.

The final step

The next step in verifying the identity and computer authentication of a user is the authorization through which the computer system specifies the access privileges to resources, deciding whether to approve or reject requests.

Conclusions

Defending and protecting your information assets and your digital reputation must therefore be a key point to better manage every business activity, taking all necessary actions:

  • train and educate companies to know the risks and techniques used to steal information and violate the IT identity;
  • use secure and proven payment methods with customers;
  • adopt digital signature and encryption systems for communications;
  • protect the hardware, software and human components of the information system;
  • provide a strategy for the safekeeping and backup of information capital.

About the author: Salvatore Lombardo

IT officer, ICT expert, Clusit member

[adrotate banner=”9″][adrotate banner=”12″]

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, computer identity)

[adrotate banner=”5″]

[adrotate banner=”13″]


facebook linkedin twitter

authentication authorization computer identity Digital Identity Hacking hacking news information security news IT Information Security malware Pierluigi Paganini Security Affairs Security News

you might also like

Pierluigi Paganini July 25, 2025
Operation CargoTalon targets Russia’s aerospace with EAGLET malware,
Read more
Pierluigi Paganini July 25, 2025
Unpatched flaw in EoL LG LNV5110R cameras lets hackers gain Admin access
Read more

leave a comment

newsletter

Subscribe to my email list and stay
up-to-date!

    recent articles

    Operation CargoTalon targets Russia’s aerospace with EAGLET malware,

    Intelligence / July 25, 2025

    Unpatched flaw in EoL LG LNV5110R cameras lets hackers gain Admin access

    Security / July 25, 2025

    Koske, a new AI-Generated Linux malware appears in the threat landscape

    Malware / July 25, 2025

    Mitel patches critical MiVoice MX-ONE Auth bypass flaw

    Security / July 25, 2025

    Coyote malware is first-ever malware abusing Windows UI Automation

    Malware / July 24, 2025

    To contact me write an email to:

    Pierluigi Paganini :
    pierluigi.paganini@securityaffairs.co

    LEARN MORE

    QUICK LINKS

    • Home
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber warfare
    • APT
    • Data Breach
    • Deep Web
    • Digital ID
    • Hacking
    • Hacktivism
    • Intelligence
    • Internet of Things
    • Laws and regulations
    • Malware
    • Mobile
    • Reports
    • Security
    • Social Networks
    • Terrorism
    • ICS-SCADA
    • POLICIES
    • Contact me

    Copyright@securityaffairs 2024

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT