Germany's Federal Office for Information Security, BSI, is warning companies against using Kaspersky antivirus products due to threats made by Russia against the EU, NATO, and Germany.
Kaspersky is a Moscow-based cybersecurity and antivirus provider founded in 1997, that has a long history of success, but also controversy over the company's possible relationship with the Russian government.
Kaspersky's founder and CEO, Eugene Kaspersky, recently expressed a wish for "compromise" regarding Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which sparked outrage on Twitter, with many rejecting the firm's stance on the matter.
Kaspersky is also believed to offer its cybersecurity protection services to Russian state IT infrastructure, making it a concern that the company cannot stay completely neutral.
BSI warns against using Kaspersky
Today, the BSI is warning German companies to replace Kaspersky AV and any other products from the firm with alternative software from non-Russian vendors.
As the BSI statement explains, antivirus software typically has higher-level privileges on Windows systems, maintaining a permanent, encrypted, and non-verifiable connection to the vendor’s servers for constant virus definition updates.
Furthermore, as real-time protection from almost all antivirus vendors can upload suspicious files to remote servers for further analysis, there is concern that antivirus developers could use their software to exfiltrate sensitive files.
While Kaspersky is likely trustworthy and ethical, it still has to abide by Russian laws and regulations, including allowing state agents to access private firm databases.
BSI is taking this further by suggesting that Kaspersky could be forced into aiding the Russian intelligence forces in carrying out cyberattacks or conducting espionage.
"The actions of military and/or intelligence forces in Russia and the threats made by Russia against the EU , NATO and the Federal Republic of Germany in the course of the current military conflict are associated with a considerable risk of a successful IT attack. A Russian IT manufacturer can carry out offensive operations itself, be forced to attack target systems against its will, or be spied on without its knowledge as a victim of a cyber operation, or be misused as a tool for attacks against its own customers."
BSI
To avoid panic moves like switching off protection without activating a replacement security product, BSI advises all organizations to prepare accordingly by first performing a complete assessment.
Also, whenever a switch to alternative security products takes place, loss of comfort, functionality, and even safety is expected, so a remediation plan to address all that must be developed.
This warning has already led to German organizations, such as Germany's Eintracht sports club, to no longer use Kaspersky's services.
However, Kaspersky believes that BSI's warning to remove Kaspersky products is a political decision rather than a technical assessment of their products.
A Kaspersky spokesperson shared the following statement with BleepingComputer regarding BSI's warnings, which we have shared in full below:
We believe this decision is not based on a technical assessment of Kaspersky products – that we continuously advocated for with the BSI and across Europe – but instead is being made on political grounds. We will continue to assure our partners and customers in the quality and integrity of our products, and we will be working with the BSI for clarification on its decision and for the means to address its and other regulators’ concerns.
At Kaspersky, we believe that transparency and the continued implementation of concrete measures to demonstrate our enduring commitment to integrity and trustworthiness to our customers is paramount. Kaspersky is a private global cybersecurity company and, as a private company, does not have any ties to the Russian or any other government.
We believe that peaceful dialogue is the only possible instrument for resolving conflicts. War isn’t good for anyone.
Our data processing infrastructure was relocated to Switzerland in 2018: since then, malicious and suspicious files voluntarily shared by users of Kaspersky products in Germany are processed in two data centers in Zurich that provide world-class facilities, in compliance with industry standards, to ensure the highest levels of security. Beyond our cyberthreat-related data processing facilities in Switzerland, statistics provided by users to Kaspersky can be processed on the Kaspersky Security Network’s services located in various countries around the world, including Canada and Germany. The security and integrity of our data services and engineering practices have been confirmed by independent third-party assessments: through the SOC 2 Audit conducted by a ‘Big Four’ auditor, and through the ISO 27001 certification and recent re-certification by TÜV Austria.
Kaspersky has set the industry benchmark for digital trust and transparency. Our customers can run a free technical and comprehensive review of our solutions, allowing them to:
- Review our secure software development documentation including threat analysis, secure review, and application security testing processes
- Review the source code of our leading solutions including Kaspersky Internet Security (KIS), our flagship consumer product; Kaspersky Endpoint Security (KES), our flagship enterprise product; and Kaspersky Security Center (KSC), a control console for our enterprise products
- Review all versions of our builds and AV-database updates, as well as the types of information which Kaspersky products send to our cloud-based Kaspersky Security Network (KSN)
- Rebuild the source code to make sure it corresponds to publicly available modules
- Review the results of an external audit of the company’s engineering practices conducted by one of the ‘Big Four’ accounting firms;
- Review the Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for Kaspersky Internet Security (KIS), Kaspersky Endpoint Security (KES), and Kaspersky Security Center (KSC)
Comments
EndangeredPootisBird - 2 years ago
From Kaspersky's Transparency Center:
"Malicious and suspicious files voluntarily shared by users of Kaspersky products in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America and the Middle East, and also several countries in Asia-Pacific are processed and stored in two data centers in Zurich. These provide world-class facilities in compliance with industry standards to ensure the highest levels of security."
"The company has moved processing of cyberthreat-related data and its storage for our customers in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America and the Middle East, and also several countries in Asia-Pacific."
Meaning, unless you live in Russia or in some Asian countries, no personally identifiable info or files are ever uploaded to Russian servers.
TsofT - 2 years ago
So if Russia moved all its nuclear weapons to other countries then Russia is disarmed?
EndangeredPootisBird - 2 years ago
That comparison doesnt work for this, if the user data isnt stored in Russian servers, then Kaspersky cant be forced into providing said data to the Russian Government, which is what all of this is about.
Drags - 2 years ago
This sounds profoundly like back in the day in the US, where there were no actual details or tech specs provided, but only a statement of "don't use it - it's Russian".
Bit sad really that there are no such infos given. What about US products? German products? They all have the same issue - possibly being used by their respective government to spy on devices and run malicious acts.
If they run this kind of advisory I'd like info if this is actively being done, not a "maybe, possibly, could, may" kind of deal. I am also able to run people over in German, French, Japanese and American cars, does that now mean populous should sell their Lada's?
lonegull - 2 years ago
The NSA hacked most AV software brands to help spy on American's after 9/11, Kaspersky was one they were not able too (as of Snowden leaks). Most software and hardware drivers send telemetry information back to the manufacturer and the NSA and FBI have hacked or spliced into most infrastructure and network backbones that it's a moot point anyways (the main reason for the push to backdoor encryption). My Epson printer drivers give you the option to participate, but even if you refuse it still installs the telemetry module anyways.